Mr. Ponzi – Patron Saint

Mr. Ponzi was a charming con-artist who operated about a century ago in the United States and Canada.  He enticed investors to contribute new money to his investment scheme (100% return in 90 days), skimmed a portion for his luxurious needs, and used the remaining money to pay off prior investors.  The system worked marvelously until it collapsed and people realized that his postal reply coupon investments could not produce the profits that supposedly paid off early investors.

More recent “Ponzi” examples include Bernard Madoff as well as hundreds of others, plus the Alan Harper character in season 8 of “Two and One Half Men.”  However Ponzi schemes are not limited to private investments.  Governments engage in similar plans and have the advantage of declaring them legal.  As with private plans, they work until they collapse, although their government granted legality increases their longevity.

Perhaps Charles Ponzi deserves recognition as the patron saint of central bankers and politicians.  Consider these systems that are similar to Ponzi schemes:

  • SOCIAL SECURITY: Current workers contribute a percentage of their wages into the Social Security system.  Retiring workers collect benefits paid by current contributions from existing workers.  If there were no current workers there could be no payout since all previous contributions have been spent.  Is this a retirement system or a Ponzi scheme?
  • SOVEREIGN DEBT: For example, a government annually spends a trillion currency units more than its income.  It borrows the difference (deficit spending).  A portion of the annual expenses is used to pay interest on debt accrued in previous years.  Debt is never retired, but always rolled over as new money repays older investments.  Since 2008 much of the new money has been “printed” and not collected as tax or other revenue due to the weak economy.  The total debt has increased rapidly.  Unfortunately, there are consequences from the creation of trillions of currency units – eventually the cost of living for all who must use the currency units is increased.
  • FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING – a simple example: A bank receives a deposit of 1 billion currency units and creates from nothing 10 billion currency units.  The bank lends those 10 billion units to a hedge fund, who deposits 1 billion currency units back into an account at the bank.  The bank collects interest on 10 billion units and repeats the process with other depositors and other loans.

The old investor (original deposit) has been repaid with new money created in the fractional reserve banking scheme.  This works until too many depositors want their deposits returned about the same time (bank run), or the loans can’t be repaid.  (Think 2008 crisis, Cyprus 2013, or Greece today).  Unfortunately, the depositor will discover that he is an unsecured creditor of the bank and that his deposit is not “his money” but a liability of the bank which might not be repaid.  FDIC and government guarantees only go so far.



Ponzi schemes work until they can no longer continue since they are based on a shaky business model.  Ask yourself:

  1. Can enough new investors be found such that ever increasing old investments plus supposed earnings will be paid back – forever?
  2. If the number of workers supporting retirees is declining, can new contributions from those workers support an increasing number of retirees – forever?
  3. If currency units can be created practically without limit in a fractional reserve fiat banking system, can we expect the value of currency units to remain constant – forever? Instead we know the increased number of currency units in circulation increases prices.  For instance, a cup of coffee might cost 5 cents before massive currency increases and $2 or $5 or $50 after such massive currency creation.

What should we do to hedge against the massive increase in the number of (Ponzi-like) currency units?  Hard assets such as gold, silver, diamonds, land, and real estate may protect you from the devaluation of currency units.

Gold and silver are long-term insurance to help protect from Ponzi economics and devaluing currency units.


Gary Christenson

The Deviant Investor


12 thoughts on “Mr. Ponzi – Patron Saint

  1. Your use of “currency units” emphasizes what they really are. Fiat money is only money when a government says it is money. Even then, it’s suspect.

    I recall visiting Germany about 50 years ago. A good dinner could be had for about US 25 cents. Now, a dinner is near 100 times as much in USA currency. Strange that people still have confidence in USA currency units. That confidence has been proven to be misplaced and such is being recognized..

  2. The Euro is going to explode to the upside, the dollar is going to tank, and gold is going to be the only currency that has value meaning it will ascend higher and higher. In fact, in the next year or so, the Euro will be the most stable currency in the world. How do I know? It has been for told in scripture.

  3. Diamonds are not a good investment as there are now man-made diamonds that are as good as nature-created ones.

    “All of the lab created diamonds at Brilliant Earth are physically, optically, and chemically indistinguishable from natural diamonds.”

  4. There is such a thing as capital gains, when the value of an asset goes up, giving the owner of that asset genuinely increased purchasing power if s/he sells that asset. It can be legitimately considered a form of profit or income, and thereby subject to a tax by government.

    But the purchasing power of gold and silver have remained relatively constant for thousands of years, in spite of wild swings in “price”. How is it possible to tease out of the price of gold and silver the difference between real capital gains (when that occurs) and the price merely adjusting to the number of fiat monetary units in circulation while the purchasing power of the metals remains the same?

    The government has a built-in incentive to want to tax any price increase in gold or silver as a capital gain, even when the owners of those assets have seen no increase in purchasing power, but have merely declined to suffer from the debasement of the fiat currency by that same government. In that case, the capital gains tax is a penalty for sidestepping the theft through inflation, the government saying, “if you don’t submit to us robbing you that way, we will rob you this way.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.